DEVELOPING A NIAS CULTURE-BASED MULTILITERACIES MODEL FOR STUDENTS’ ENGLISH READING AND WRITING SKILLS AT SMP NEGERI 6 NAMOHALU ESIWA
Abstract
Students’ English reading and writing skills remain a challenge in rural educational contexts, while local culture has not been optimally integrated into English language instruction. Learning materials are often general and insufficiently connected to students’ cultural experiences and local contexts. This study aimed to develop and conduct a limited implementation of a Nias culture-based Multiliteracies Model for English reading and writing instruction. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, consisting of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The developed model integrated Nias cultural content, written texts, visual representations, collaborative meaning-making activities, and English reading and writing tasks, supported by a culture-based e-module. The limited implementation involved 25 students and 8 teachers, with complete learning-performance data available from 24 students. Data were collected through reading and writing assessments, student and teacher response questionnaires, observations, interviews, and documentation. The findings showed that the developed model and e-module were positively received by the participants. Students’ overall response reached a mean score of 4.696 out of 5, while teachers’ overall response reached 4.75 out of 5. Students also reported positive responses to the culture-based e-module, particularly in terms of enjoyment of its use (4.88/5), interest in Nias cultural materials (4.84/5), and interest in visual and video materials (4.84/5). The learning-performance data showed changes between the initial and subsequent measurements; however, these findings are reported as preliminary evidence because the limited implementation involved no control or comparison group and the statistical analysis of reading and writing outcomes requires further examination. The findings suggest that the Nias culture-based Multiliteracies Model is acceptable to students and teachers and has potential as a culturally relevant approach to English reading and writing instruction. Further implementation with more comprehensive statistical analysis and comparative research designs is needed to establish its effectiveness.
References
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). Palgrave Macmillan.
Da Silva, C., Pereira, F., & Amorim, J. P. (2024). The integration of Indigenous knowledge in school: A systematic review. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(7), 1210–1228.
Dewi, D. S., Hartono, R., Saleh, M., et al. (2023). Investigating multiliteracy pedagogy practices of EFL-speaking teachers in Indonesia. [Journal information not provided], 169–175.
Fradana, A. N., Suwarta, N., & Sotlikova, R. (2025). Strengthening multimodal literacy through digital literary text learning: Enhancing students’ achievement in the age of disruption. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(1), 216–225.
Fitria Rahmawati, Lutfiyah, Palupi, T. M., Cahyani, A. N., & Zalukhu, A. (2026). AI-Assisted Critical Reading in Enhancing EFL Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 710-722. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i2.419
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Giyatmi. (2020). Bringing Indonesian local wisdom into the English class. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Language, Literature, and Arts Education (ICLLAE 2019) (pp. 48–53). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.009
Hulu, N. F., Zebua, E. P., Harefa, A. T., & Maru’ao, N. (2024). Developing English teaching materials based on local wisdom for the tenth grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Alasa. Academic Education Journal, 15(2), 1459–1478. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i2.2507
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Mandarani, V., & Megawati, F. (2024). Transforming literary texts: A multiliteracies approach to engaging digital narratives. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(2), 419–426.
Manuhutu, N., Faridi, A., Syafri, F., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2023). Integrating Maluku local wisdom as English teaching material to build students’ character in globalization era. Proceedings of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, 9(1), 551–559.
Nabhan, S., & Habók, A. (2025). Development and validation of the Teacher Multiliteracies Scale (TMS) for English language teacher education. System, 131, 1–14.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Nurcahyoko, K., Anniurwanda, P., & Sudirjo, E. (2024). Investigating the factors influencing literacy skills among young students in rural areas of Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 18(2), 333–341.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
Prihantoro, P., Suherdi, D., & Muslim, A. B. (2022). Developing students’ multimodal communicative competence through multiliteracies pedagogy. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 6(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v6i2.5242
Sangaji, C. M., Ashar, I. K., & Syah, I. K. (2022). Local culture-based literacy instruction and its impact on students’ critical reading skills in Eastern Indonesia. Jurnal Tahuri, 20(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol20issue1page21-39
Siregar, L. K., Mayuni, I., & Rahmawati, Y. (2023). Culturally responsive English teaching: Developing a model for primary school EFL teachers in Indonesia. Issues in Educational Research, 33(4), 1582–1600.
Wulandari, D., Sundari, W., & Ellysafny, C. A. P. (2020). Integrating local wisdom into ELT materials for secondary school students in Semarang. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v10i1.14-21
Zalukhu, A. N. C., Sihite, J. E., & Hasanah, U. (2025). Improving students’ business letter writing through a genre-based approach. [Journal information not provided], 5(3), 275–281

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



