EUPHEMISM AND DYSPHEMISM IN BLACK PANTHER: A SOCIOPRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POWER AND IDENTITY
Abstract
Language functions as a strategic tool for regulating social interactions and power dynamics through provocation or politeness. This study investigates the use of euphemism and dysphemism in the film Black Panther, focusing on how characters manage sociopolitical tensions. Utilizing Allan and Burridge’s (2009) framework, this qualitative research analyzed 12 linguistic items identified within the film’s screenplay. The data were categorized through a three-stage analytical procedure: classification, description-interpretation, and theoretical synthesis. The results indicate a significant dominance of euphemisms (8 items or 66%) over dysphemisms (4 items or 34%). Euphemisms primarily function as a "linguistic shield," with metaphor being the most frequent strategy, followed by flippancy and figurative expressions. These strategies enable characters to negotiate political responsibilities and preserve national dignity without confrontation. Conversely, dysphemisms are employed as "verbal weapons," notably through synecdoche and non-verbal gestures, to intimidate opponents when diplomatic boundaries are breached. These findings demonstrate that characters prioritize "face-saving" and political stability, reflecting a sophisticated balance between personal loyalty and survival in high-pressure environments.
References
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/forbidden-words/taboos-and-their origins/2B74DE5DE1437207E89473755DB157DE.
Astuti, T. M.,Sauomi H., & Prasatyo, B. A. (2020). Behind the Mask: A Psychological Exploration of Emily Nelson’s Sociopathic Traits in A Simple Favor Movie: A pragmatic analysis. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 165-170.
http://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v6i2.1798
Aziz, A., & Umiera, H. (2025). Politeness strategies in film: A pragmatic analysis of dialogue in “the social network.” International Journal Linguistics of Sumatra and Malay, 4, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijlsm.v4i1.20786
Battistella, E., Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1993). Euphemism & Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Language, 69, 406. https://doi.org/10.2307/416552
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.167?srsltid=AfmBOorWdwhQO_o4R3X9jze1WhJsb-0FDmy3o7DjussylF6YPxax5W0r
Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and Language Change: The Sixth and Seventh Ages. Lexis, 7.
https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355
Casas Gómez, M. (2012). The Expressive Creativity of Euphemism and Dysphemism. Lexis, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.349
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2014). Euphemism and political discoursein the British regional press. Brno Studies in English, 40, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-1
Culpeper, J. (2011) Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dhiaa, S. (2025). Expressions of Dysphemism and Euphemism on The Met Gala: A Pragmatic Study. Journal of College of Education for Women, 115–132.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.
https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
Mustofa, M. A. (2022). The analysis of euphemism expression in Joe Biden’s speech “Statement on Terror Attack in Afghanistan” [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang]. E-Theses Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University.
Mberwa, O. (2025). The use of euphemisms as one of face saving tactics in haya language. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 13, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20251305.13
Nasuli, P. A., Gustary, D. T., & Prasatyo, B. A. (2020). Politeness strategies in the 2020 Biden-Trump presidential debate: A pragmatic analysis. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 66-74
https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v6i1.1672
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
https://uk.sagepub.com/en
gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation
methods/book232962
Radjabkulov, Otakhon Rustamugli. (2023). The Function of Euphemisms in Communication. 1(7).
https://webofjournals.com/index.php/12/article/view/184
Sitanggang, M., Setia, E., & Ganie, R. (2020). Dysphemism Used in Deadpool Movie Paper Title. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 4, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v4i2.73
Strong, M., & Chaplin, K. (2019). Afrofuturism and Black Panther. Contexts, 18, 58–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219854725
Yuga Rendra Nata, E., . S., & Alim Cendekia, D. (2020). Afrofuturism in Black Panther Superhero Costume as Culture Sustainability Media (Charles Sanders Pierce Semiotic Analysist). KnE Social Sciences, 4(12), 199–208.
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i12.7596
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
