EMBODIED MEANING CONSTRUCTION IN EFL LITERARY READING: A READER-RESPONSE STUDY OF THE OLD MAN AND THE SEA
Abstract
This study investigates how meaning is constructed through embodied cognitive processes when EFL learners engage with The Old Man and the Sea. Grounded in Barsalou’s Embodied Cognition Theory (1999, 2008), which conceptualizes language comprehension as the reactivation of perceptual, motor, bodily, and affective systems rather than abstract symbol manipulation, the study examines reader responses to a literary text characterized by narrative restraint and minimal explicit emotional description. The participants were undergraduate students from the English Literature Study Program at Universitas Negeri Makassar enrolled in the History of English Language and Literature course (2024 cohort). 142 students across five intact classes (A–E), 57 students (40.1%) selected The Old Man and the Sea as their preferred final-test novel and constituted the focal participant group. Data were collected through an open-ended reflective questionnaire eliciting emotional reactions, imagined experiences, reflective pauses, and lingering thoughts after reading. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis with theory-driven coding, guided by embodied cognition categories including sensorimotor imagery, bodily state, action simulation, and affective response. The findings reveal that students consistently relied on embodied simulation to construct meaning, reporting strong experiences of empathy, loneliness, sadness, and admiration derived from imagining Santiago’s physical struggle, pain, fatigue, and isolation. Meaning emerged through experiential inference, as understanding developed from felt bodily and affective engagement rather than explicit textual cues. The study demonstrates the pedagogical potential of literary reading in EFL contexts to foster affective engagement, empathy development, and reader-centred meaning construction, while extending embodied cognition research to authentic classroom-based literary experiences.
References
Anderson, R. (2001). Embodied writing and reflections on embodiment. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 33(2), 83–98.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for grounding cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.116
Bolens, G. (2012). The style of gestures: Embodiment and cognition in literary narrative. JHU Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421405186
Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 5–18.
Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
Harkin, P. (2005). The reception of reader-response theory. College Composition & Communication, 56(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20054001
Holm, A. (2025). The Stylistics of Embodiment: Language and Sensory Memory in Lyric Texts. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78230-5
Jumpertz, J. (2025). Situation Models and Embodied Cognition. In The Routledge Companion to Literature and Cognitive Studies (pp. 339–351). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003387473-32
Kaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., Carranza, J., & Fox, M. R. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension. In The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 118–126). Routledge.
Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002
Kontovourki, S. (2014). Reading (through) bodies: Students’ embodied performances of poetry and testing. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 9(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.899545
Kuzmičová, A., Supa, M., Segi Lukavská, J., & Novák, F. (2022). Exploring children’s embodied story experiences: a toolkit for research and practice. Literacy, 56(4), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12284
Lee, S. W. S., & Cecutti, L. (2022). Three mechanisms of mind–body influence: Feelings, concepts, and procedures. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000262-024
Miall, D. S. (2018). Reader‐Response Theory. A Companion to Literary Theory, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118958933.ch9
Nijhof, A. D., & Willems, R. M. (2015). Simulating fiction: individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with fMRI. PLoS One, 10(2), e0116492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116492
Nuttall, L. (2024). Experiencing Mind Style: From Iconicity to Sensory Simulation. In Style and Sense (s) (pp. 151–175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54884-0_7
Otis, L. (2022). The role of multimodal imagery in life writing. SubStance, 51(3), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2022.0030
Sidenius, I., & Roald, T. (2024). Beyond words: Exploring the embodied nature of reading fiction. Qualitative Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000290
Soylu, F. (2016). An embodied approach to understanding: Making sense of the world through simulated bodily activity. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01914
Sun, L. (2023). Pedagogies of discomfort and empathy in foreign language education: Fostering EFL learners’ critical global thinking through literature and art. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101411
Van Der Weel, A., & Mangen, A. (2022). Textual reading in digitised classrooms: Reflections on reading beyond the internet. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102036
Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.661
Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x
Zwaan, R. A. (2021). Two challenges to “embodied cognition” research and how to overcome them. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.151
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
