COLLABORATIVE TRANSLATION AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY IN INDONESIAN HIGHER EDUCATION
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of collaborative translation in enhancing student engagement and language development in translator education. The research addresses three questions: (1) how collaborative translation influences student engagement, (2) to what extent it improves language proficiency, and (3) what factors affect its effectiveness in classroom practice. Using a mixed-methods design, the study involved 20 sixth-semester students in an English Literature program at HKBP Nommensen University. Data were collected through classroom observations, a five-item Likert-scale questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and pre- and post-tests assessing vocabulary, grammar, and translation accuracy. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively using mean comparisons, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis and triangulation across data sources. Results showed consistent improvement in language performance, with mean scores increasing from 68 to 80 in vocabulary, 70 to 82 in grammar, and 65 to 78 in translation accuracy, indicating moderate learning gains. Questionnaire and interview findings revealed increased participation, shared responsibility, and greater confidence during collaborative tasks. The effectiveness of the project was influenced by group interaction, lecturer feedback, student motivation, and the use of digital resources. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The findings suggest that collaborative translation supports process-oriented and socially mediated translation learning.
References
Brashi, A., & Abdel Latif, M. M. M. (2024). Teaching Arabic–English legal translation using model texts: A mixed-method study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1308. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03837-1
Cai, Y., & Enríquez Raído, V. (2025). Web-based resource use patterns among trainee translators. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier.
Dong, D., & Chen, M.-L. (2025). Metacognitive strategies in translation: A comparative study of student and professional translators. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Edelia, A. D., & Maharsi, I. (2022). Translation as a learning strategy among EFL higher education students. Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching.
García-Santiago, L., & Díaz-Millón, M. (2024). Pedagogical and communicative resilience before industry 4.0 in translation and interpreting education. Education and Information Technologies.
González Davies, M. (2004). Multiple voices in the translation classroom: Activities, tasks, and projects. John Benjamins.
Hamed, D. M., & Alqurashi, N. (2025). A corpus-driven study on legal translation challenges among students. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Hariyanto, S., Maulidiyah, F., & Suyono, A. (2026). Authentic and simulated project-based learning to improve students’ employability skills and translator competence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Kiraly, D. (2000). A social constructivist approach to translator education. St. Jerome Publishing.
Li, C., & Tekwa, K. (2025). Translation as a catalyst for foreign language learning mediated by instructor feedback and peer collaboration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Malmkjaer, K. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of translation. Cambridge University Press.
Newmark, P. (1995). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
Niu, J., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Does simplification hold for machine translations? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456.
Ramírez-Polo, L., & Vargas-Sierra, C. (2023). Translation technology and ethical competence: An analysis and proposal for translators’ training. Languages, 8(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020093
Su, W., & Li, D. (2023). The effectiveness of translation technology training: A mixed-method study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 595.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xu, S., Su, Y., & Liu, K. (2025). Investigating student engagement with AI-driven feedback in translation revision: A mixed-methods study. Education and Information Technologies.
Zappatore, M. (2024). Incorporating collaborative and active learning strategies in a computer-assisted scientific translation course. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning.
Zhang, J., Zhao, X., & Doherty, S. (2025). Prompt engineering in translation: How student translators leverage generative AI tools. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XX.
Zhang, M., & Huang, Z. (2022). Crowdsourcing in higher education: A sustainable translation teaching model. Sustainability, 14(6), 314
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
