A Review of Cognitive Approaches in SLA: Identifying the Most Influential Factors from Key Studies
Abstract
This study investigates cognitive approaches to Second Language Acquisition (SLA) by examining key components such as attention, working memory, L1 transfer, and cognitive restructuring. A systematic literature review was conducted using the SALSA framework, focusing on ten peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2023. The findings reveal that attention serves as a gateway for input processing and learning, while working memory determines learners’ capacity to handle linguistic information. Additionally, L1 transfer can either facilitate or hinder L2 learning depending on language distance and learner awareness. Cognitive restructuring, driven by practice and feedback, enables proceduralization of explicit knowledge. In the Indonesian EFL context, these cognitive mechanisms are especially relevant due to the multilingual backgrounds of learners and the dominance of teacher-centered instruction. The study suggests that instruction should be cognitively informed by enhancing attention through input salience, adapting to working memory limits, managing L1 influence, and fostering restructuring through reflective practice. These insights provide a pedagogical model grounded in cognitive SLA principles, aiming to improve English learning outcomes in Indonesia.
References
Ellis, N. C. (2019). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The CREED framework. The Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 61–79.
Godfroid, A. (2020). The effects of implicit instruction on attention to L2 form. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in SLA (pp. 169–192). Routledge.
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdes Kroff, J. R. (2018). Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence from L1 entrenchment. In M. G. Gaskell & J. Mirkovic (Eds.), Speech perception and spoken word recognition (pp. 309–334). Psychology Press.
Leow, R. P., & Donatelli, L. (2023). Noticing gaps in SLA: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 85–107.
Puig-Mayenco, E., Rothman, J., & Westergaard, M. (2020). The role of L1 in L3 acquisition: A generative approach. Second Language Research, 36(1), 3–24.
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2021). Metalinguistic awareness and cognitive flexibility in L2 learning. Language Awareness, 30(1), 1–20.
Sagarra, N., & Ellis, N. C. (2021). The role of WM in implicit and explicit L2 learning. Language Learning, 71(S1), 167–205.
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2022). Explaining the efficacy of practice for L2 learning. Language Teaching, 55(2), 147–161.
Wen, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Working memory and L2 sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 721–747.
Nugroho, A. (2021). Working memory and EFL learning in Indonesian classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 32(1), 45–67.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).