Perbedaan Derajat Keasaman  Kulit Wajah, Dada dan Punggung Pada Penderita Akne Vulgaris di Kota Medan Tahun 2019

Yuni Selfiana br. Sembiring; Rudyn Reymond Panjaitan; Kristo A Nababan

doi:10.36655/njm.v7i1.511

Yuni Selfiana br. Sembiring Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Rudyn Reymond Panjaitan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Kristo A Nababan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36655/njm.v7i1.511

Keywords: degree of acidity, acne vulgaris

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is a disease of the pilosebaceous unit that often occurs in adolescents and young adults. The pathogenesis of acne vulgaris involves several factors, one of which is the acidity (pH) of the skin.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the difference in the degree of acidity of facial skin, chest and back of patients with acne vulgaris.

Methods: This was a comparative analytic study with cross sectional design. The sample collection technique was consecutive sampling. Data were analyzed using ANOVA-test.

Results: The majority of patients with acne vulgaris who came to Murni Teguh Memorial Hospital Medan and the private clinic of dr. Rudyn Reymond Panjaitan, M.Ked (KK), Sp.KK was a 17-25 year old. The mean acidity of facial skin with acne vulgaris was 5.66, the mean acidity of chest skin was 5,84 and the mean acidity of back skin was 6.09. There was a significant difference in the mean value of acidity in facial, chest and back skin of patients with acne vulgaris (p = 0,000).

Conclusion: There is a significant difference in average degree of acidity on the facial, chest and back skin in patients with acne vulgaris.

References

1. Wasitaatmadja SM. Akne, erupsi akneiformis, rosasea, rinofima. Dalam: Djuanda A, Hamzah M, Aisah S, editor. Ilmu penyakit kulit dan kelamin. edisi 6. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FKUI; 2011. Hal. 254–9.
2. Movita T. Acne vulgaris. Contin Med Educ. 2013;40(4):269–72.
3. Karimkhani C, Dellavalle RP, Coffeng LE, Flohr C, Hay RJ, Langan SM, et al. Global skin disease morbidity and mortality an update from the global burden of disease study 2013. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(5):406–12.
4. Prakash C, Bhargava P, Tiwari S, Majumdar B, Bhargava KR. Skin Surface pH in acne vulgaris: insights from an observational study and review of the literature. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;7(10):33–9.
5. Sparavigna A, Tenconi B, Ponti I De, Penna L La. An innovative approach to the topical treatment of acne. Dovepress. 2015;4(8):179–85.
6. Kim SA, Kim BR, Chun MY, Youn SW. Relation between pH in the trunk and face: truncal pH can be easily predicted from facial pH. Ann Dermatol. 2016;28(2):216–21.
7. Putri E. Perbedaan derajat keasaman pada kulit wajah antara penderita akne vulgaris dengan tanpa akne vulgaris di Kota Medan (skripsi). Universitas HKBP Nommensen; 2019.
8. Brad AY, Hick J, Reese EL, Uhas A, Feldman SR, Balkrishnan R. Acne vulgaris in the United States: a descriptive epidemiology. Cutis. 2010;86:94–9.
9. Wisesa TW. Perawatan kulit dan kosmetik pada remaja. Dalam: Sugito TL, Prihianti S, Danarti R, Rahmayunita G, editor. Perawatan kulit dan kelamin: sejak bayi hingga remaja. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FKUI; 2013. Hal. 50–9.
10. Ali SM, Yosipov G. Skin pH: from basic science to basic skin care. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93:261–7.
11. Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30:269–73.
12. Schmid Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;19:296–302.
13. Rippke F, Schreiner V, Schwanitz H-J. The acidic milieu of the horny layer: new findings on the physiology and pathophysiology of skin pH. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(4):261–72.
14. Fluhr JW, Dickel H, Kuss O, Wehyer I, Diepgen TL, Berardesca E. Impact of anatomical location on barrier recovery, surface pH and stratum corneum hydration after acute barrier disruption. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:770–6.