ANALISIS KESESUAIAN MATERI AJAR DENGAN TES HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA DI LINGKUNGAN FKIP UHN MEDAN.

  • Suryati Sitepu
Keywords: Conformity Analysis, Teaching Material, Learning Outcomes Test.

Abstract

This research is a type of evaluation research conducted using qualitative methods. This research will be conducted at the Teaching and Education Faculty of the University of HKBP Nommensen. The time for conducting this research is the odd semester of the 2019/2020 school year. Plans that will participate in this research are Lecturers of FKIP UHN Medan. The sample chosen in this study was one lecturer who worked on each odd semester course at FKIP UHN by taking a sample with a random sampling technique. This study aimed to explain the topic and the suitability of the material submitted with material given to students by lecturers of Mathematics Education Study Program UHN Medan FKIP 2019/2020 Academic Year. The results showed that: 1) Overall syllabus conformity with teaching materials approved by lecturers from each study program at FKIP UHN was 99,428. It can be concluded that the learning objectives based on PBM carried out by lecturers in FKIP UNH are already "Very Good". 2) Overall, the suitability between the minutes of lectures and the questions tested by lecturers from each study program at FKIP UHN for UTS is 98.86% and UAS is 100%. So it can be concluded that the learning objectives to be achieved which have been programmed before have "Very Good".

References

Arikunto, S. 2002. Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bahrul Hayat, dkk. (2001). Sistem Penilaian Buku. Jakarta : Pusat Perbukuan.
Maryani, Sri. 2009. Pengembangan Materi ajar Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif Mata Kuliah Komputerisasi Akuntansi (Studi Kasus: Myob Accounting 17 Pada Modul Banking). https://www.gunadarma.ac.id/ library/articles/graduate/
Mujimin. 2010.Kompetensi Guru Dalam Menyusun Butir Soal Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Jawa di Sekolah Dasar. Semarang, Lingua:Vol.6(2).https://journal.unnes.ac.id/
Phil, E. H. M. & Indrawati. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Belajar untuk Guru SMP. Bandung: PPPPTK IPA.
Purwanto, 2011. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Raka Joni. (1983). Pengembangan Paket Belajar. Jakarta : Dirjen Dikti.
Rasyid H. & Mansur (2007).Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandug : Wacana Prima
Sitepu, Suryati. 2019.Efektivitas Materi ajar Dengan Alur Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa Prodi Matematika UHN. Medan, SEPREN: Vol.1(1) https://jurnal.uhn.ac.id
Situmorang, Adi S. 2018.Desain Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa FKIP UHN. Medan, Jurnal penelitian bidang pendidikan: Vol.24(2) https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/penelitian/issue/archive
Gultom, Sanggam. 2019. Perbedaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Software Dengan Pendekatan Open Ended Berbantuan Software Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Medan, SEPREN: Vol.1(1) https://jurnal.uhn.ac.id
Sungkono, dkk. (2003). Pengembangan Materi ajar. Yogyakarta: FIP UNY.
Sukardi, H.M. 2009. Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip & Operasionalnya. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara
Tasri, Lu’mu. 2011. Pengembangan Materi ajar Berbasis Web. Jurnal MEDTEK, Volume 3, Nomor 2, Oktober 2011. (Online), (http://elektro.unm.ac.id/jurnal/Vol 3/Jurnal%20Lu'mu%20Tasri.pdf),
Tian Belawati, dkk. (2003). Pengembangan Materi ajar . Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan UT.
Undang-Undang RI, no 14 tahun 2005, tentang guru dan dosen, Jakarta: Grafika.
Wakhinudin. 2010. Tes objektif. Artikel. Tersedia pada http:// wakhinuddin. wordpress.com /2010/06/03/ tes-objektif/
Zainul, A dan Nasution, N. 1997. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Published
2020-09-28