Perbandingan Performansi Sistem ORC Dengan Varian R-216CA, R-112a, R-141b dan n-Pentane Menggunakan Aspen HYSYS

  • Siwan Ediamanta Perangin-angin Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Sindak Hutauruk Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Keywords: Performance, ORC System, ASPEN HYSYS

Abstract

One of the generation systems that are widely used in various power generation industries is the Organic Rankine Cycle. This cycle has the advantage of a low evaporation point compared to the ordinary steam turbine cycle. The use of refrigerants is the key to the ORC system. Refrigerant is a fluid with quite unique characteristics and many types. This study discusses the use of various types of refrigerants used in the ORC system, namely R-216CA, R-112a, R-141b and n-pentane. By using the Aspen Hysys luna device, we can compare the performance of each Refrigerant Variant of the ORC system. With the same input parameters in each variant, namely for the incoming refrigerant temperature is 600C with a pressure of 450 Kpa, the pump exit pressure is 4000 Kpa, the results are obtained from the Pump Work, Q Condenser, Q Boiler and the resulting turbine power. The result is that the ORC system with refrigerant n-Pantene has a high value for Pump Work, Q Condenser, Q Boiler and Turbine Power produced, but when compared to performance, the System with Refrigerant with R-112a has a higher efficiency value when assessed from its performance.

References

[1] Torres. Agustin M. Delgado, Lourdes Garcia-Rodriquez. Journal of Energy Conversion andManagement 51 (2010) 2846 – 2856
[2] Qiu. Guoquan. Journal of Renewable Energy 48(2012) 565 – 570
[3] Siwan Ediamanta Perangin-angin, Himsar Ambarita, Waldemar Naibaho, Parulian Siagian, Marhiras Sitanggang, Libianko Sianturi, “Perbandingan Performansi 4 Variasi Siklus Kompresi Uap 2 Tingkat”, SJoME Vol. 2 No. 1, Agustus 2020
[4] Wang. Man, Jiangfeng. Wang, Yuzhu. Zhao, Pan.Zhao, Yiping. Dai. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering 50 (2010) 816 – 825
[5] Ali Jurmut, Tayser Sumer Gaaz, Abdul Amir H. Kadhum, Ahmed A. Al-Amiery .Design and performance evaluation of a portable hybrid desalination unit using direct contact membrane distillation in dual configuration. Energy Procedia 158 (2019) 904-910
[6] Carlos R. Altafini, Paulo R. Wander, Ronaldo M. Barreto, Prediction of theworking parameters of a wood waste gasifier through an equilibrium model, 2003,Energy Conversion and Management, 44: 2763–2777.
[7] Cimini Silvano, Prisciandaro Marina and Barba Diego. Simulation of a wasteincineration process with flue gas cleaning and heat recovery sections usingAspen Plus, 2005, Waste Management 25: 171-175.
[8] Oyedepo SO, Fagbenle RO, Adefila SS, Adavbiele SA. Performance evaluation andeconomic analysis of a gas turbine power plant in Nigeria. Energy Convers Manage2014;79:431–40.
[9] Zhang N, Cai R. Analytical solutions and typical characteristics of part-load performancesof single shaft gas turbine and its cogeneration. Energy Convers Manage2002;43:1323–2337.
[10] Baccioli A, Antonelli M. Organic flash cycles: off-design behavior and controlstrategies of two different cycle architectures for waste heat recovery applications.Energy Convers Manage 2018;157:176–85.
[11] Bakalis DP, Stamatis AG. Full and part load exergetic analysis of a hybrid micro gasturbine fuel cell system based on existing components. Energy Convers Manage2012;64:213–21.
[12] Lee YD, Ahn KY, Morosuk T, Tsatsaronis G. Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluationof a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined heat and power generation system.Energy Convers Manage 2014;85:154–64.
Published
2021-02-26
How to Cite
Perangin-angin, S., & Hutauruk, S. (2021). Perbandingan Performansi Sistem ORC Dengan Varian R-216CA, R-112a, R-141b dan n-Pentane Menggunakan Aspen HYSYS. SPROCKET JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2(2), 42-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36655/sproket.v2i2.526